The different sides of M&E
The West and Central Africa Division of IFAD organised yesterday (19 June 2013) a talk on the importance of Impact
Evaluations in Programme Implementation. The talk was given by our new
Colleague Franck Luabeya Kapiamba, the Country Programme Officer (CPO) for the
Democratic Republic of the Congo.

From his experience, on whichever side he found himself, the
questions and complexities regarding M&E and evaluating impact are the
same:
- What are we trying to measure or to prove? Which questions are we trying to answer?
- Are our projects effective? Have they reached their objectives?
- Do our projects really impact the lives of the farmers who participate in them?
- Are we using the proper tools to undertake our analysis?
- Is quantitative data enough to demonstrate our impact? Can impact be limited to numbers?
- How important is qualitative data in impact evaluation?
- Are we objective in our method? Is our data reliable?
Of course the questions we chose to answer imply many things
and can change during course of our observations according to the findings of
our observations and the data collected.
Franck stressed the importance of consistency throughout the
evaluations and the need for good baseline surveys, midterm and final
evaluations of projects and programmes. He outlined some methods that can be
observed to achieve good evaluations and explained some risks like selection
bias of the control group. In order to mitigate some of the risks associated to
ineffective M&E, he suggested that technicians with good experience in the
project area are selected.
To continue the discussion, you can follow us on twitter
#ifadm&e, #ifad, #drc or contact Franck directly l.kapiamba@ifad.org
Comments